<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.economist.com/sections/business-finance/rss.xml"  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Business and finance</title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/sections/business-finance/rss.xml</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
 
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Airport profits: ready to depart]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726099-boring-shops-extra-security-and-ride-hailing-hurt-airports-airport-profits-ready-depart?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_WBD001_0.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_WBD001_0.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1280" height="720" width="1280" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>WHEN Heathrow airport opened, in 1946, the only retail facilities were a bar with chintz armchairs and a small newsagent’s. The first terminal was a tent, a far cry from the four halls, resembling vast shopping malls, at the London airport today. Retail spending per passenger is the highest of any airport. This summer’s consumer crazes include Harry Potter wands and cactus-shaped lilos.</p><p>Heathrow’s journey from waiting room to retail paradise is the story of many airports. Before the 1980s, most income came from airlines’ landing and passenger-handling charges. Then “non-aeronautical” revenue—from shops, airport parking, car rental and so on—rose to around two-fifths of their revenues, of $152bn worldwide in 2015. But amid signs that non-aeronautical income is peaking, especially in mature aviation markets such as North America and Europe, the industry fears for its business model.</p><p></p><p>When airports were state-owned, and run not for profit but for the benefit of the...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726099-boring-shops-extra-security-and-ride-hailing-hurt-airports-airport-profits-ready-depart?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726099-boring-shops-extra-security-and-ride-hailing-hurt-airports-airport-profits-ready-depart#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/business">Business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/business">Business</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726099 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Why the world’s best footballers are cheaper than they seem]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726098-share-clubs-revenues-highest-transfer-fees-have-been-fairly-constant?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FNP002_0.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FNP002_0.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1280" height="720" width="1280" style="height: auto" /><span class="caption">A head for figures</span></div></p><p>FOR football clubs, August is often the costliest month, when they make vast bids for each other’s players. This year has been particularly lavish. On August 3rd Paris Saint-Germain (PSG), a French team, signed Neymar da Silva Santos Júnior, a Brazilian forward, from Barcelona for €222m ($264m), more than double the previous record price for a footballer.</p><p>With three weeks of the transfer “window” left, teams in Europe’s “big five” leagues—the top divisions in England, Spain, Germany, Italy and France—have paid €3.2bn, just short of the record of €3.4bn set last year. The €179m splurged by Manchester City, an English club, on defenders outstrips 47 countries’ defence budgets. Arsène Wenger, a veteran manager of Arsenal, a London team, and an economics graduate, describes the modern transfer market as “beyond calculation and beyond rationality”.</p><p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726098-share-clubs-revenues-highest-transfer-fees-have-been-fairly-constant?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726098-share-clubs-revenues-highest-transfer-fees-have-been-fairly-constant#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/finance-and-economics">Finance and economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/finance">FINANCE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726098 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Investment in American infrastructure is falling]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726092-donald-trumps-trillion-dollar-package-remains-hypothetical-investment-american?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FNC448_1.png" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FNC448_1.png" alt="" title="" width="608" height="625" width="608" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>IT IS not a number to tweet about. President Donald Trump plans to plough $1trn of spending into America’s crumbling infrastructure. And a dearth of capital is not a problem: investors are keen on such assets. But investment seems to be falling.</p><p>Government infrastructure spending in the second quarter fell to 1.4% of GDP, the lowest share on record (see chart). According to Thomson Reuters, investment by American municipalities in the first seven months of this year, at $50.7bn, was nearly 20% below the same period in 2016. Private-sector infrastructure funds show a similar trend, according to Preqin, another data provider: deal volume in the first half of 2017 fell by 7.5%, year on year, to $36.6bn; the number of deals fell by a quarter.</p><p></p><p>Not long ago optimists were expecting an infrastructure-spending boom. In May Blackstone, a private-equity firm, announced with much fanfare a new $40bn fund for American infrastructure, with a $20bn investment from one of Saudi Arabia’s...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726092-donald-trumps-trillion-dollar-package-remains-hypothetical-investment-american?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726092-donald-trumps-trillion-dollar-package-remains-hypothetical-investment-american#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/finance-and-economics">Finance and economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/finance">FINANCE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726092 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Investors are not great at predicting politics]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726084-wishful-thinking-may-lead-them-astray-investors-are-not-great-predicting?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FNC435_1.png" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FNC435_1.png" alt="" title="" width="608" height="625" width="608" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>FINANCIAL markets are supposed to be the font of all wisdom, weighing up the information available and condensing it into a set of prices. Investors are presumed to have an insight into the future—falling bond yields are seen as a sign that the economy is slowing, for example.</p><p>But are investors that clever when it comes to politics? Gambling markets show how they assess political risk. They expected the Remain campaign to win the Brexit referendum and Hillary Clinton to become America’s president, and were proved wrong. Indeed, on Brexit, the mass of gamblers (the general public, in other words) backed Leave, but the odds were skewed by some wealthy punters who favoured Remain. Those rich gamblers were probably people who trade in financial markets; the plunge in the pound after the result suggests that most investors were caught on the hop.</p><p></p><p>Before the presidential election, most people on Wall Street to whom Buttonwood spoke thought that a victory for Donald Trump would be...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726084-wishful-thinking-may-lead-them-astray-investors-are-not-great-predicting?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726084-wishful-thinking-may-lead-them-astray-investors-are-not-great-predicting#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/finance-and-economics">Finance and economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/finance">FINANCE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726084 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Helen Alexander, former CEO of The Economist Group, died on August 5th]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21725895-helens-humanity-intelligence-and-charm-will-be-missed-she-was-60-dame-helen-alexander?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/2017/08/articles/main/20170805_wbp003.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/2017/08/articles/main/20170805_wbp003.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1280" height="720" width="1280" style="height: auto" /><span class="caption">Circulation wizard</span></div></p><p>ROLE models for women in business are still too rare, not least in Britain. Last November an independent review backed by the government urged FTSE 100 companies to raise the share of women on their boards from 27% to 33% by 2020. Sadly, that push this week lost one of its leading champions, Helen Alexander, the deputy chair of the review.</p><p>Business had no better ambassador. She was self-effacing but a world-class networker—a winning combination that helps explain, along with her intelligence and charm, why all sorts of firms wanted her on their board (from Northern Foods to Centrica, Rolls-Royce and the British arm of Huawei), to advise them (Bain Capital) or to chair them (the Port of London Authority and, more recently, UBM, an events business). In 2009 she became the first woman to be president of the Confederation of British Industry, the country’s main employers’ group.</p><p></p><p>But Helen had built her reputation in...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21725895-helens-humanity-intelligence-and-charm-will-be-missed-she-was-60-dame-helen-alexander?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/business-and-finance/21725895-helens-humanity-intelligence-and-charm-will-be-missed-she-was-60-dame-helen-alexander#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/business">Business</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 06 Aug 2017 16:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21725895 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[How do you solve a problem like Korea? Investors are unsure]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/blogs/buttonwood/2017/08/guam-storm?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/20170812_FNP504_facebook.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/20170812_FNP504_facebook.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1200" height="627" width="1200" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>EUROPEAN markets have started the day with losses of 1% or so, following a 2% decline in Hong Kong’s Hang Seng index and the 1% loss in the S&amp;P 500 index on Thursday. The Vix, a much used measure of market fear, jumped to 16, its highest level since the presidential election.</p><p>These are significant moves by the standards of recent months but, to anyone who lived through 2008 (or 1987) they are hardly signs of outright panic. Gold is at $1,288 an ounce, up 2% or so over the week. The Japanese stockmarket was barely changed on Thursday, and Japan is right in the firing line of North Korea’s missiles. South Korea would suffer terribly in any war but the Seoul market was down just 1.7% today, and 3.2% on the week.</p><p></p><p>Clearly, the markets are more worried than they were on August 9th, when President Trump warned of “fire and fury” against Kim Jong-Un’s regime. Investors did not take too seriously the statement from the president, who is known for his intemperate (and often factually inaccurate)...<a href="http://www.economist.com/blogs/buttonwood/2017/08/guam-storm?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/blogs/buttonwood/2017/08/guam-storm#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/blog-sites/buttonwood-s-notebook">Buttonwood’s notebook</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 09:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726208 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Chasing higher yields, investors pile into risky countries]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726103-iraq-greece-argentina-and-others-tap-enthusiasm-high-yielding-sovereign?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FNC449.png" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FNC449.png" alt="" title="" width="608" height="587" width="608" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>WHERE can you find a 7% interest rate on a sovereign dollar-bond? You would have to take a time-machine to the mid-1990s to find such a yield on a ten-year American Treasury. Alternatively, you could slip back a few days to August 2nd and bid for the $1bn of five-year bonds sold by the government of Iraq. The yield was expected to be 7%, but it was trimmed to 6.75% once orders rose above $6bn.</p><p>Such eagerness for hard-currency debt from a country still reeling from a civil war shows just how far bond investors will now go to get a decent yield. Oversubscribed issues for risky sovereign bonds have become almost normal. The Iraqi sale came just a week after Greece (whose privately held debt was partly written off in 2012) raised €3bn ($3.5bn) in its first bond sale for three years. In June Argentina was inundated with bids for its 100-year eurobond, as dollar-denominated bonds are known. Sceptics noted that Argentina had defaulted on its debts six times in the previous century, with the most...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726103-iraq-greece-argentina-and-others-tap-enthusiasm-high-yielding-sovereign?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726103-iraq-greece-argentina-and-others-tap-enthusiasm-high-yielding-sovereign#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/finance-and-economics">Finance and economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/finance">FINANCE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726103 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Australia’s CommBank is accused of abetting money-laundering]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726087-its-intelligent-deposit-machines-were-used-laundromats-criminals?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/2017/08/articles/main/20170812_fnp502.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/2017/08/articles/main/20170812_fnp502.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1280" height="720" width="1280" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>WHEN the Commonwealth Bank of Australia on August 9th reported its profit for the year to June—above forecasts and just shy of A$10bn ($7.9bn)—it faced questions about cashflows of another sort. Six days earlier the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC), a regulator charged with gathering financial intelligence to combat money-laundering and terrorism, had launched proceedings against it for “serious and systemic non-compliance”. Citing “collective responsibility” for the bank’s reputation, Catherine Livingstone, its chairwoman, has announced cuts to bonuses for Ian Narev, the chief executive, and others.</p><p>Founded 106 years ago, CommBank, as it is known, is one of Australia’s biggest banks. AUSTRAC traces its case to 2012, when the bank started installing “intelligent deposit machines”. They accept cash, let depositors stay anonymous and allow money to be switched to other accounts in Australia and overseas straight away. CommBank sets...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726087-its-intelligent-deposit-machines-were-used-laundromats-criminals?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726087-its-intelligent-deposit-machines-were-used-laundromats-criminals#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/finance-and-economics">Finance and economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/finance">FINANCE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726087 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[An Israeli pharma champion sickens]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726083-country-frets-about-what-tevas-decline-means-israeli-pharma-champion-sickens?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_WBP004_0.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_WBP004_0.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1280" height="720" width="1280" style="height: auto" /><span class="caption">National pride and joy</span></div></p><p>THE headlong plunge of shares in Teva, a pharmaceutical giant—down by over 40% since August 2nd—is causing consternation beyond the firm’s shareholders and employees. The company was founded in Jerusalem in 1901, is the largest in Israel and is the country’s only multinational with its headquarters still at home. Since beginning its rapid expansion abroad in the early 1980s it has been called “the nation’s share” by Israelis, whose pension funds have invested heavily in its success.</p><p>That prosperity came chiefly thanks to the firm’s most popular proprietary drug, a bestselling medication for multiple sclerosis called Copaxone. Over the past two decades its sales paid for a global spree of buying generic-drugs competitors. Last year Teva completed its most ambitious purchase, of Actavis Generics, an American generics manufacturer, for $40.5bn; financing the deal took its debt to $35bn. But Teva’s transformation into the...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726083-country-frets-about-what-tevas-decline-means-israeli-pharma-champion-sickens?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726083-country-frets-about-what-tevas-decline-means-israeli-pharma-champion-sickens#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/business">Business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/business">Business</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726083 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch’s bid for Sky hits more obstacles]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726082-britain-will-further-scrutinise-foxs-standing-broadcaster-rupert-murdochs-bid-sky-hits?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_WBP006_0.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_WBP006_0.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1280" height="720" width="1280" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>RUPERT MURDOCH’S penchant for mass-market media has made him billions of dollars. It also gets in the way of empire-building. In 2011 News Corp’s bid to take full ownership of Sky, a European pay-TV giant, fell apart amid public rancour over phone hacking by journalists at the <em class="Italic">News of the World</em>, one of his tabloids (since closed). Now a renewed Murdoch family takeover attempt for Sky, a bid of £11.7bn ($15.2bn) by 21st Century Fox, faces yet more scrutiny over concerns about alleged scurrilous reporting at Fox News, Mr Murdoch’s American cable-news channel.</p><p>On August 8th Karen Bradley, Britain’s culture secretary, asked Ofcom, the media regulator which had already reviewed the bid, to take another look to determine whether 21st Century Fox meets Britain’s broadcasting standards. Ms Bradley’s request followed fresh complaints about Fox News from members of parliament, including Ed Miliband, the former leader of the opposition Labour Party, and from...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726082-britain-will-further-scrutinise-foxs-standing-broadcaster-rupert-murdochs-bid-sky-hits?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726082-britain-will-further-scrutinise-foxs-standing-broadcaster-rupert-murdochs-bid-sky-hits#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/business">Business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/business">Business</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726082 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Who will be the next chair of the Federal Reserve?]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726081-gary-cohn-leading-candidate-replace-janet-yellen-who-will-be-next?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FND001_0.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_FND001_0.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1280" height="720" width="1280" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>LOOK only at unemployment and inflation, says Peter Conti-Brown, a historian of the Federal Reserve, and Janet Yellen is the Fed’s most successful boss of all time. The second indicator may be below target, but that is a blip compared with the recessions most Fed chairmen have endured. So it is perhaps not surprising that President Donald Trump is openly considering retaining Ms Yellen, a Democrat installed by Barack Obama, after her term ends in February 2018. Nor by historical standards is it odd: the Fed’s past three leaders were all reappointed by presidents from the other party. Yet Ms Yellen, whom Mr Trump criticised on the campaign trail, is not the leading candidate. PredictIt, a betting site, gives her a 28% chance of staying put. In front of her, with a 36% chance of appointment, is someone else Mr Trump is publicly weighing up: Gary Cohn (on the left above).</p><p>Mr Cohn was until January the chief operating officer and president of Goldman Sachs. He left that role to become the...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726081-gary-cohn-leading-candidate-replace-janet-yellen-who-will-be-next?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/finance-and-economics/21726081-gary-cohn-leading-candidate-replace-janet-yellen-who-will-be-next#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/finance-and-economics">Finance and economics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/finance">FINANCE</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726081 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title><![CDATA[Mistrust in America could sink the economy]]></title>
 <link>http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726079-part-problem-lack-competition-some-industries-mistrust-america-could-sink?fsrc=rss</link>
 <description><![CDATA[<p><div class="ec-content-image ec-thumbnail content-image-full"><a href="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_WBD000_0.jpg" class="ec-enlarge"></a><img src="http://cdn.static-economist.com/sites/default/files/images/print-edition/20170812_WBD000_0.jpg" alt="" title="" width="1280" height="720" width="1280" style="height: auto" /></div></p><p>AMERICA is a grumpy and confused place. For an overarching explanation of what has gone wrong, a decline in trust is a good place to start. Trust can be defined as the expectation that other people, or organisations, will act in ways that are fair to you. In the White House and beyond there is precious little of it about. People increasingly view institutions as corrupt, strangers as suspicious, rivals as illegitimate and facts as negotiable.</p><p>The share of Americans who say “most people can be trusted” fell from 44% in 1976 to 32% in 2016, according to a survey from the University of Chicago. In a new book, “The Retreat of Western Liberalism”, Edward Luce, a commentator for the <em class="Italic">Financial Times</em> in Washington, argues that distrust will contribute to America’s decline and eventually, even, to autocracy. Lack of faith is chewed over in boardrooms, too. In his latest letter to shareholders, Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan Chase’s boss, describes trust as America’s...<a href="http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726079-part-problem-lack-competition-some-industries-mistrust-america-could-sink?fsrc=rss">Continue reading</a>]]></description>
 <author>The Economist online</author>
 <comments>http://www.economist.com/news/business/21726079-part-problem-lack-competition-some-industries-mistrust-america-could-sink#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/site-sections/business-and-finance">Business and finance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/topics/approved">Approved</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/web-sections/business">Business</category>
 <category domain="http://www.economist.com/category/print-sections/business">Business</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2017 14:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">21726079 at http://www.economist.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>